<aside> π¨
</aside>
2.3% of global VC. All-female founding teams, 2024. Unchanged in 30 years.
2.3% is not one problem. It's eight. Eight research-documented layers of bias that fire before a female founder says a word. Together, they form The Invisible Tax.
225+ peer-reviewed sources below. No opinions. Just the proof.
<aside> β οΈ
Global VC to all-female teams
Unchanged since the 1990s.
</aside>
<aside> π°
Revenue per $1 invested
Women outperform 2.5x. Still underfunded.
</aside>
<aside> πΈ
Per prevention question
Women get these 2.3x more. Harvard, 2018.
</aside>
<aside> π¬π§
UK VC per Β£1 to all-female teams
Men get 89p.
</aside>
<aside> π
Built by Anna Mazarsky
17 years. 500+ founders. $60M+ raised. Creator of The Pink X Power Systemβ’ β the first methodology built for the rules female founders actually face.
</aside>
<aside> β‘
The Pink X Power Systemβ’
5 phases. 10 methodologies. One outcome: Inevitable.
DIAGNOSE β POSITION β ARM β EXECUTE β CLOSE
From Invisible to Inevitable.
</aside>
<aside> π§
Jump to what you need Β· Full outline lives in the sidebar β°
π Core Data Β· π§ The Invisible Taxβ’ (8 Layers) Β· π° Quick Citations Β· ποΈ Full Archive (225+ sources) Β· π The Solution
</aside>
<aside> β οΈ
2.3% - The share of global VC funding that went to female-only founding teams in 2024 ($6.7B out of $289B total)
</aside>
pie title Who Gets the Venture Capital? (2024)
"All-Male Teams" : 83.6
"Mixed-Gender Teams" : 14.1
"All-Female Teams" : 2.3
xychart-beta
title "Female Founder VC Share (%)"
x-axis ["2019", "2020", "2021", "2022", "2023", "2024"]
y-axis "% of VC" 0 --> 4
bar [2.8, 2.3, 2.5, 1.9, 2.1, 2.3]
| Year | % Female-Led | What happened | 2019 | 2.8% | Pre-pandemic peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2.3% | π Pandemic - women cut first | 2021 | 2.5% | π Recovery |
| 2022 | 1.9% | π Contraction - women cut first, again | 2023 | 2.1% | Slow recovery |
| 2024 | 2.3% | Still below 2019β£ |